dumbed down

I’d like to expand on something I wrote near the end of my last post on the current boom in Texas. As I said, buying into or shorting secular trends is a key investment strategy for me, and Texas’ explosive growth is a major opportunity. But I don’t think most people understand why the state is doing so well. It’s not just because of its low taxes and hands-off regulatory regime. If that were the case, low-tax backwaters like Alabama and Mississippi would be thriving, too. What sets Texas apart is education, especially the public UT system, which possesses the third largest endowment in the country behind only Harvard and Yale.

Dynamic, innovative economic regions–with the highest per capita incomes–always benefit from quality educational systems. Silicon Valley and the Northeast are the most obvious examples. But other places like North Carolina’s research triangle have also been fueled by great schools. The reason for this isn’t rocket science. You simply can’t have sustained economic growth without a steady supply of smart, highly educated people.

The problem is that schools cost a lot of money. And most states these days–especially the state where I live, California–spend far more on prisoners, public employees, and old people than education. It’s a disturbing secular trend, so disturbing that if California were a stock, I’d short it.

California used to be at or near the top in education spending. Then it passed the infamous Proposition 13 and everything changed. Older Californians, many of whom benefited from the state’s great schools and almost free public universities, shafted their children and grandchildren so that they could pay lower property taxes. Now the state is Mississippi-west when it comes to education spending and the UC system, once the greatest public university system in the world, is a shadow of its former self.

I’d like to see Prop 13 repealed in its entirety. That’s probably never going to happen, but we should at least reform the extremely unfair commercial real estate sections of the law. Giving individual homeowners a break on their taxes is one thing, but there’s no reason why wealthy commercial landlords like Shorenstein Properties should pay 1978-level taxes on lucrative holdings like high-rises and business parks. I can assure you, they’re not charging their tenants 1978-level lease rates. Their properties should be reassessed every year based on the real revenues they are able to reap from them, and the funds collected should be dedicated solely to education.

Earlier this year, a bill that would have done almost this exact thing was proposed–and promptly quashed–in Sacramento. Opponents of the bill called it a “job killer.” The unintended irony of that phrase would be laughable if the stakes weren’t so high. Shortsighted policies like Prop 13 have been killing off California’s economic prosperity for a generation now.

4 thoughts on “dumbed down

  1. Emmett Murphy

    Scott: I agree with you on the prop 13 situation and the challenge facing UC and other institutions. But as you mention earlier the real culprit is the public unions and the outrageous salaries/pensions. Further, if you look under the tent, I think you will find that the number of bureaucrats in the UC System, feeding off the trough and contributing zero to the education of these kids is appallingly high. The bureaucracy is at fault here with massive costs associated with it. Money is not the issue, its how is spent and that is dictate by the legislature. I seriously doubt that the problem would be fixed if Prop13 were removed. They would just waste more money on “administration”…..As to the comments on the commercial guys, if that is correct, then it is absurd. No wonder they are rich. Texas by the way has very high property taxes and a lot of hidden taxes so our tax burden is in the middle of the pack.

    1. scott fearon Post author

      I agree that too many public schools are choking on overpaid administrators and political correctness. But per capital spending is important – and it is impossible for California to spend needed money on public school students given the limitations from proposition 13. We should do both – spend more and refocus on teaching the 4 R’s. School infrastructure is also critical – kids are likely to learn more in smaller schools with smaller class sizes (the Gates foundation has studied this issue). And they are likely to do better when schools are new and inviting, vs. the too often dilapidated school buildings.

  2. fearoff

    i think your thesis on education is only partially correct. i completely agree with the generational theft view, but that is a national phenomenon as well, not endemic just to CA. the teachers unions have also become more of a political institution than one focused on proper education – and politicians pander to them for the votes. ..and education also can be misleading, because what if everything you learned is wrong or not reflective of reality? i can only imagine some of the economic teachings espoused in liberal CA institutions.

    also, a lof of states have good education systems with moribund economies – NC, MI, IL…so this clearly is not the major factor

    TX benefits most from both resource endowment and being the most business friendly, capitalistic state in the union. the positive business environment and tax regime drives positive immigration which further contributes to economic growth and prosperity.

    hopefully all these bluestaters moving to TX, recognizes the failure of their states and change their voting patterns..

  3. Pingback: yes, dammit, i’m going to write about texas again | the confessions of a contrarian investor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *